CO129-535-6 Leave and passage regulations 2-6-1931 - 30-3-1932 — Page 4

I should leave it in, as evidently the rule has not puthen into

disuce in it.i.

مه ممكن

offran

an increment

4

10A. It used to be the mile, I believe, that

I pay leave the received

morely was paid

of salary - the undrawse morely

to the offein acting for him. So far as

9

the rule has fallen into disuse, when bol. Regins.

were under revisions it last sentence of Regler 120.

އނ

decided to omit the

? omit it here.

10 B(1-3). We have mice received more

on this subject. The fps were sent to

elaborate regles.

hs. Bevis for Asous, a

day or so

mend not comment here.

a so ago

-

Cound we

10 (1) - su also paras. 2 T3 £3. If we are to

have compulsory transfers under unification - it will

-

be only reasonable to allow prev. Col. service to count, A matter, tobe taber into account:

I believe also that this principle is

recognised in Malaya, although there is no direct

tort is les regles.

reference toit

? approve.

11(3) - are also pare 8 of 3. H. Kong may

find it difficult at frost to reckon leave wonder

both sets

of Reghus.. but mace the you. is satisfied

I think we need not comment??

10 B.- su also parco 5

also pares 5-743. Hitherto

any grant of leave under the beneficial brathes. mik

has been reckoned as

Adomasy

realdmany

leave

for

the

propose of calculating the leave of an offices. the effer

besong that the

officin

has had to work

off

the leave

before drawing in the beneficial bucks, again. It is I'— afraid, going too far to rule that an offices

be granted up to tenths, extra operal leave canly his whole service; but now

mony

me is the comx

of